Thursday, November 21, 2013

Week 8 EOC Bratz Battle

Mattel felt it owned the idea of bratz and sued the designer in an effort to make that a reality. From that point on it went from bad to worse to farcical. At one point, the court ordered MGA to turn over all future plans for the Bratz line. Which was then reversed? which was reversed by a lower court. which was re-reversed by the original court. This led to counterclaims flying from both directions and the last we had heard, Mattel, which had originally filed the suit, was being hit with a judgment for $309 million in damages, including MGA's court fees. Adding that together with Mattel's legal expenses and this fight over dolls put Mattel on the hook for nearly $700 million. “Now, it appears the fight is finally over. And, like many long legal battles, the lawyers are the only ones coming out ahead.”

“A federal judge ordered Mattel, the world's biggest toy maker, to pay MGA Entertainment, which introduced the Bratz line of pouty, multi-ethnic dolls a decade ago, more than $309m in damages, fees and other costs arising from a legal wrestling match quite unbecoming of the plastic ladies they make”

We will do whatever it takes, to protect our intellectual property. "You can bet that anyone working for Mattel that's thinking of freelancing and coming up with a product of their own is going to think twice about how they do it," added McGowan.


this whole thing I really blown out of proportion if you ask me. Its two doll companies fighting over right to who created Bratz. With all the legal things that are going on. This be revised then it being re-revised. It is a cycle going on. It keeps going right back to the courts. In the end it seems like the only people getting paid is the lawyers if It keeps going like that.

Week 8- 10 Questions


1.       Can you please explain the difference between optioning a screenplay and buying the rights to a screenplay?
2.       I want to make a film about a deceased celebrity. Do I need to option or pay for their life rights?
3.       Should I be concerned about filming a famous building? How about verbally referencing a specific brand?
4.       I’m shooting my film in another state. Do I need to set up a limited liability company (LLC) in that state?
5.       Do I really need errors and omissions (E & O) Insurance?
6.       Can I use a song or other copyrighted work in my film if I change ... percent of it?
7.       What good legal resources are out there?
8.       Why should I copyright my work?
9.       Do I need to get the rights to music used in my film if I'm not charging people to view it?

1.   Can treatments be sold to film studios or production companies to adapt them into screenplays?

Thursday, November 14, 2013

week 7 EOC Lawyers!

Week 7 EOC lawyers     Zachariah stepke
Name
CRAIG P. KENNY                               (702) 380-2800                   ckenny@cpklaw.com
BRADLEY L. KENNY           (702) 380-2800                   bkenny@cpklaw.com.
JOHN L. DUFFY                  (702) 380-2800                   jduffy@cpklaw.com
Peter H. Ajemian             Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Las Vegas
Bryce Earl                            Cotton, Driggs, Walch, Holley, Woloson & Thompson, Las Vegas
Michael N. Feder                             Gordon Silver, Las Vegas
LAWRENCE E. MITTIN                     lmittin@cpklaw.com
Billie-Marie Morrison                     bmorrison@cpklaw.com
Marianne Y. Denton                       mdenton@cpklaw.com

Michael McOsker                             mmcosker@cpklaw.com